Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emilio Nava vs Calum Puttergill Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nava vs Puttergill analysis and find out who is favored!
Emilio Nava vs Calum Puttergill Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Puttergill
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 51.18% of points on their second serve, while Puttergill has won 46.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 48.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Puttergill has won 53.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.03% and 33.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 66.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Puttergill has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 60.53% of matches played (W/L 46/ 30), with Puttergill winning 34.62% (W/L 9/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 65/ 35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 38/ 34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20), where as Puttergill has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.62% of matches (W/L 9/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 1 times and Puttergill being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Puttergill winning 0. The last match between Nava and Puttergill was at the Stanford Challenger, 12-08-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Emilio Nava getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Puttergill have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nava winning 0 times and Puttergill 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 0, and Puttergill 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of 317.75 while Puttergill has played against players with an average rank of 194.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Puttergill has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 40.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Puttergill has converted 54.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
137
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
888
Rank
663
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
59% (174-119)
Career Total W/L
49% (170-174)
56% (20-16)
YTD W/L
38% (3-5)
$402,385
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Emilio Nava vs Calum Puttergill For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nava VS Puttergill
Sportsbook
Offer
Nava VS Puttergill H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Emilio Nava | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:31 | 1:13:31 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (25/45) | 63% (42/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (20/25) | 52% (22/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (13/20) | 48% (12/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (33/67) | 27% (12/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Nava VS Puttergill H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Calum Puttergill
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emilio Nava | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (20/16) | 38% (3/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (47/38) | 45% (9/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (443/418) | 47% (82/94) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.65 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 273 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 110 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:8 | 1:37:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 322.14 | 129.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1710/2767) | 62% (339/548) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1223/1710) | 65% (219/339) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (541/1057) | 46% (97/209) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (92/227) | 54% (25/46) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (959/2646) | 41% (227/559) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 38% (3/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (20/36) | 38% (3/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 26% (5/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 46% (6/13) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 0% (4/0) |
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Leandro Riedi
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
16
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
23 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
7
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
23 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
61%
(
74 of
121)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Emilio Nava
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Emilio Nava
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
48%
(
40 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Calum Puttergill
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nava Vs Puttergill Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nava are available here and Puttergill photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emilio Nava
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
